|
|
|
|

|

Janusz Stolarczyk, circa 1989. |

Janusz Stolarczyk in 2004. |
Dom Development is building houses in Warsaw for Poland’s new middle class
Janusz Stolarczyk, Rafal Wegrzyniak and Andrzej Halicki, Polish property
developers, speak with EBRD press officer Axel Reiserer in Warsaw.
Amidst the glittering facades of Warsaw´s new skyscrapers, it is tempting to
forget the many problems that still exist in the shadow of these splendid
symbols of the new Poland. More than 1 million Polish families still do not
have their own homes – they live with their extended families or in communal
flats – and the vast majority still rent, says Janusz Stolarczyk, general
manager of Dom Development.
So it is no surprise that demand for housing is growing throughout Poland,
especially in the capital. And this in theory should be a boon for development
companies. But in practice it has not been easy to meet the demand.
Janusz Stolarczyk looks back: “In 1989 I was a board member of one of the big
building cooperatives which, under communism, provided 95 per cent of all
flats in Warsaw.” The cooperative developed the properties and sold them at
prices which of course, under the communist system, had little to do with
their real value. “We were not exactly selling flats during that period, but
our clients eventually obtained them after long waiting periods.” Inevitably,
the failure of the command economy to meet the huge demand created a black
market in which people were selling their flats for two or three times the
price charged by the cooperatives.
Under communism the quality of housing was a luxury rather than a major
consideration for developers and for clients. All over central and eastern
Europe thousands of faceless multi-floor apartment buildings made of concrete
panels sprang up like mushrooms during the 1950s and still shape the skyline
in ex-communist countries. After the enormous damage of World War II the need
for housing was so great that often people moved into flats before
construction was even finished. Uncovered pipes and electricity conductors,
broken lifts, leaky windows and many other shortcomings were constant features
of life under communism.
Another factor that has strongly contributed to the massive demand for housing
in the big cities is the ongoing migration from the countryside to the urban
areas. “People want to live here because there is work here,” Stolarczyk says
of Warsaw. While the rest of Poland suffers from an unemployment rate of some
20 per cent, in Warsaw there is almost full employment. Guest workers are
brought in from Ukraine, Belarus and Moldova to work on the capital’s building
sites.
The population influx into Warsaw should be good news for developers such as
Dom. But it also means that in many respects the city is stretched beyond its
capacities. The development of new housing sites is constrained by the limited
availability of public transport. The first underground line along the
north-south artery, opened in 1995 and currently 16 kilometres, brought only
limited relief. Individual car ownership is growing as a result: last year
alone 300,000 cars were newly registered in Warsaw.
The biggest challenge for Dom has been to change peoples’ attitudes, says
Stolarczyk. “To buy a flat or a house is the biggest investment in the
lifetime for the majority of our people. Fifteen years ago people did not make
far-reaching plans, they were worrying to make ends meet from one month to
another.”
Another major problem was the fact that mortgage finance was almost completely
unknown in the communist economy. Where there are no owners, there is nothing
to mortgage. Custumers had to be convinced they could safely invest their
future earnings in mortgages on houses built by trustworthy and reliable
companies. In the beginning of the free market-era this was not always the
case. But today the property market in Warsaw is stable, says Andrzej Halicki,
PR director for the Polish Developers’ Council. “The weak companies have
collapsed.” Adds Stolarczyk: “It is an indication of how much the situation
has improved that people are starting to plan for the future. Our credibility
is a guarantee that the risk is limited.”
Dom Development, established in 1996/97, is one of the biggest players among
approximately 200 competitors in the market. The company targets small
families (two adults, one child) and is currently working on several
developments. The most popular flats on offer are 50 square metres in size,
each with two bedrooms, a kitchen and a bathroom. “It is a compromise between
the affordable and the desired,” says Stolarczyk. Depending on location,
prices vary between PLN2,800 and PLN4,500 per square metre. The average
mortgage instalment roughly equals the average rent in Warsaw, at PLN1,000 per
month.
The first step for Dom was to convince land owners and banks to trust the
company. Having the EBRD on board as an investor gave confidence to the
market: “Only with a big bank like the EBRD we could grow and take on bigger
projects,” says Stolraczyk. “The EBRD has a very good reputation and its
participation is warmly received in our country,” adds Halicki.
Every year the company provides the market with more than 1,000 apartments and
houses. In 2003 there was a massive increase in sales to people who feared
that Poland’s accession to the European Union in May 2004 would cause prices
to skyrocket. As a result the market was “almost flat in the early months of
2004, but now we have re-established our usual selling rate,” explains
Stolarczyk.
Someone who has benefited doubly from the improvement in Warsaw’s housing
market is Rafal Wegrzyniak. Dom has given him a job (he is marketing director)
and a house: “I was still at school when communist rule ended. But life is
much better now. I have a wife, a house, and a car. Life is easier, but
competition is more intense.”
Janusz Stolarczyk adds: “For active people it’s much easier. But for older
people, who can afford only little, life is much worse.” At which point
Andrzej Halicki intervenes: “You know us Polish people. We always have to
complain about something before we can acknowledge that it is actually not so
bad.”
5 November 2004
|