|
|
|
|

Dilapidated housing can't keep out the Siberian cold. |

Surgut Mayor Alexander Sidorov. |
It is hard for westerners to understand why anyone would want to live in
Siberia. In the western Siberian city of Surgut, the temperature can fall to
minus 50, the winter is seven months long, and conditions appear inhospitable
to human life.
Nonetheless, there is an unmistakable civic pride among Surgut residents. Many
volunteered to move there in the 1960s when hundreds of thousands of young
families from all over the USSR headed east. They were lured by the romance of
the remote territories, high wages in the booming oil sector, and the state’s
promise of a glorious Siberian future.
When massive deposits of oil were found in Siberia’s Khanti-Mansi region in
the 1960s, the small village of Surgut grew in population from around 8,000 in
1965 to 70,000 in 1975 and 300,000 now.
Housing had to be thrown together quickly. At one point, the city was building
300,000 square metres of residential housing every year. Most of it was panel
housing, with ten-metre pre-fabricated slabs of concrete slapped together to
make walls and floors.
Housing is crumbling
The problem today is that the housing stock, flung up in one great
construction boom, has deteriorated to an extent that diminishes quality of
life and is even dangerous. Cement is crumbling, balconies are sinking,
draughts are terrible.
The situation is not unique to Surgut. Two-thirds of the people living in
Russia’s 2.8 billion square meters of housing want their housing improved,
according to the state housing and construction agency Rosstroy.
Alexander Sidorov, Surgut’s Mayor, says: “In the 1960s and 1970s, the city
built very intensively. The quality of that construction is not very good. If
we don’t do anything now, in seven or eight years we will have very dangerous
housing on our hands.” The potential of roof collapse is just one of the
worries.
In a pioneer programme that the Russian authorities hope will become a
blueprint for other municipalities, the EBRD is providing the Surgut
municipality with a RUR700 million (€20 million) loan to finance four new
municipal housing buildings, and to knock down two old concrete panel
buildings.
Hard to stay warm
The buildings due to be knocked down are in a parlous state. Concrete slabs
are sagging and look beaten-up and unsafe. Exterior walls are thin and no
barrier to the cold. Heat from the centralised, municipally-managed district
heating system that warms big radiators in each flat must be supplemented with
residents’ own electric heaters.
Olga Panova, a 55-year-old resident who’s lived in the block for 20 years,
points to the floor beneath the window. “Feel that!” she says. “It’s like a
refrigerator.”
The new buildings will be safer, warmer, and 30 per cent more energy
efficient. Of the 800 new apartments, most will be sold on the private market,
while up to 25 per cent will be provided to low-income families. This tallies
well with the Russian government’s commitment to provide social housing.
Transforming government
Evgeny Ofrikhter, the EBRD banker handling the Surgut loan, says this project
is about far more than building 800 housing units. It is about transforming
the way the municipal government is structured to handle housing issues.
The project’s main component is the city’s review of its housing policy,
definition of roles for the public and private sectors in the housing market,
and establishment of a special municipal housing authority to manage the
project. The authority will eventually take the EBRD loan onto its own balance
sheet, and be spun off from the city to be run by residents’ associations.
“The sale of most of the flats will provide the money for social housing units
and further project development. It’s what makes this project viable and
sustainable,” says Mr Ofrikhter.
Anatoly Vatz, a local Duma deputy and editor of ‘Surgut-Region’ newspaper,
says: “This will help the city to develop a new mechanism for addressing
housing issues through transparent tenders, market finance and efficient
managerial systems. That would be a great gift to the city, probably worth a
lot more than the actual loan.”
Alexander Melnik, one of the dynamic, business-minded individuals who stand
out in Russia’s regions, exemplifies the changes underway in the municipal
government. In 2002, working out of the Mayor’s office, he helped co-ordinate
Surgut’s first EBRD-financed project, a €45 million project to upgrade water
and district heating. Now he’s running Yugra Consulting, a special company set
up to handle innovative projects in municipal services and the housing sector,
at arm’s length from the Surgut municipality and the Khanti-Mansi Autonomous
Okrug-Yugra authorities.
“Yugra is small but we hope it can be extended and broadened and use its
experience to advise other Siberian municipalities on the massive
reconstruction now getting underway in Russian cities.”
Borrowing long-term
Mayor Sidorov says he’s happy the EBRD is financing another Surgut project:
“From the EBRD we get longer-term money than would normally be available to
us. We draw on the Bank’s international experience, in part through
consultants funded by donors via the Bank.”
But the Surgut project must first get off the ground. Residents are becoming
involved in negotiations. In one old house, low-income residents congregate in
a kitchen to review questions about the project. Where in the city will the
new houses be built? Will the city make good on its word to finally give them
new homes? Will they be treated well? Here, as elsewhere in Russia, the issue
of improved housing is a catalyst for a new level of civic participation.
By Julian Evans, freelance writer
Photos: Yevgeni Kondakov
Contact: Municipal and environmental infrastructure
29 March 2007
|