|
Abstract
This paper provides a non-technical summary of a framework for evaluating the
transition impact (social returns) of any infrastructure investment that
reduces transaction costs and thereby intensifies product market competition.
The framework applies both to physical and institutional infrastructure. We
show that infrastructure generates welfare gains by improving the ability of
the market to weed out existing inefficient firms ("market selection"), by
changing the incentives for firms to lower their costs by restructuring, and
by providing greater (less) incentives to enter for low (high) cost potential
entrants. We illustrate by simulation analysis that conventional cost-benefit
analysis is not likely to capture these dynamic transition impacts of
infrastructure.
|